nhcarrigan/elysium
9
0
Fork 0
generated from nhcarrigan/template
Code Issues 5 Pull Requests 1 Actions Releases 10 Activity

bug: prestige multiplier tooltip inconsistency — "After next prestige" sometimes displays 1.15x compounding instead of 1.25x #203

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-01 12:56:01 -07:00 by hikari · 0 comments
hikari commented 2026-04-01 12:56:01 -07:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Description

Reported by ilenia and discussed with deusmortis in the Discord channel after the 0.4.0 release. The "After next prestige" tooltip appears to sometimes use 1.15x as the compounding base multiplier rather than the 1.25x stated in the 0.4.0 release notes. This causes players to see a lower projected multiplier than they should be receiving.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Prestige several times.
  2. Open the prestige panel and observe the "After next prestige" multiplier value.
  3. Calculate what the value should be at your current prestige count using 1.25x compounding.
  4. Compare — the tooltip sometimes shows a value consistent with 1.15x compounding instead.

Expected Behaviour

The "After next prestige" tooltip should consistently show the compounded result using the actual 1.25x base multiplier per the 0.4.0 release notes.

Actual Behaviour

The tooltip intermittently displays a value consistent with 1.15x compounding. Players with no runestone production upgrades (deusmortis at P13) see values matching 1.15^n exactly, suggesting the base rate in the calculation may actually be 1.15x, not 1.25x.

Additional Notes

  • This may indicate the 0.4.0 patch notes are incorrect and the actual rate is 1.15x, or that there are two separate code paths using different base rates.
  • Players with runestone production bonuses (ilenia) see higher values that partially obscure the discrepancy.
  • There is a separate (possibly intentional) behaviour where the displayed "current multiplier" reflects the total production multiplier including all upgrades and runestone bonuses, not just the prestige bonus — this was flagged as confusing by both players and may warrant a UX clarification regardless of the rate bug.

✨ This issue was created with help from Hikari~ 🌸

## Description Reported by **ilenia** and discussed with **deusmortis** in the Discord channel after the 0.4.0 release. The "After next prestige" tooltip appears to sometimes use **1.15x** as the compounding base multiplier rather than the **1.25x** stated in the 0.4.0 release notes. This causes players to see a lower projected multiplier than they should be receiving. ## Steps to Reproduce 1. Prestige several times. 2. Open the prestige panel and observe the "After next prestige" multiplier value. 3. Calculate what the value *should* be at your current prestige count using 1.25x compounding. 4. Compare — the tooltip sometimes shows a value consistent with 1.15x compounding instead. ## Expected Behaviour The "After next prestige" tooltip should consistently show the compounded result using the actual 1.25x base multiplier per the 0.4.0 release notes. ## Actual Behaviour The tooltip intermittently displays a value consistent with 1.15x compounding. Players with no runestone production upgrades (deusmortis at P13) see values matching `1.15^n` exactly, suggesting the base rate in the calculation may actually be 1.15x, not 1.25x. ## Additional Notes - This may indicate the 0.4.0 patch notes are incorrect and the actual rate is 1.15x, or that there are two separate code paths using different base rates. - Players with runestone production bonuses (ilenia) see higher values that partially obscure the discrepancy. - There is a separate (possibly intentional) behaviour where the displayed "current multiplier" reflects the *total* production multiplier including all upgrades and runestone bonuses, not just the prestige bonus — this was flagged as confusing by both players and may warrant a UX clarification regardless of the rate bug. --- ✨ This issue was created with help from Hikari~ 🌸
naomi closed this issue 2026-04-06 18:17:01 -07:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
aspect
code
Concerns the software code in the repository
aspect
dx
Concerns developers' experience with the codebase
aspect
interface
Concerns end-users' experience with the software
aspect
text
Concerns the documentation material in the repository
contribute
good first issue
A great opportunity for a team member to learn a new codebase
contribute
help wanted
Open for anyone on our team to grab.
contribute
staff only
Restricted to our executive leadership.
goal
addition
Addition of new feature
goal
fix
Bug fix
goal
improvement
Improvement to an existing feature
points
1
Very simple issue requiring minimal effort and complexity.
points
13
Extremely complex issue representing major undertakings. Should be broken down into smaller pieces.
points
2
Simple issue that requires a bit more thought or investigation.
points
3
Moderate complexity issue requiring more substantial work.
points
5
Complex issue requiring significant effort and expertise.
points
8
Very complex issue requiring extensive work and deep expertise.
priority
critical
1
Must be fixed ASAP
priority
high
2
Stalls work on the project or its dependents
priority
low
4
Low priority and doesn't need to be rushed
priority
medium
3
Not blocking but should be fixed soon
priority
none
5
No priority, should only be performed when a developer is available
status
awaiting triage
Has not been triaged & therefore, not ready for work
status
blocked
Blocked and therefore not ready for work
status
discarded
Will not be worked on
status
discontinued
Not suitable for work as repo is in maintenance
status
label work required
Needs proper labelling before it can be worked on
status
ready for dev
Ready for work
status
ticket work required
Needs more details before it can be worked on
talk
discussion
Open for discussions and feedback
talk
question
Can be resolved with an answer
time
1 day
Approximately one full day of development work.
time
1-2 weeks
One to two weeks of focused development effort.
time
2-3 days
Two to three days of development effort.
time
4-5 days
Approximately one week of development work.
time
<1 day
Less than one day of focused work. Quick fixes or simple tasks.
time
>2 weeks
More than two weeks of development work. Must be broken down into smaller pieces.
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
gurkirat hanna (Hanna Rose) hikari (Hikari) minori (Minori) naomi (Naomi Carrigan) rain teklu tim
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: nhcarrigan/elysium#203
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?