generated from nhcarrigan/template
Naomi Carrigan
296a50fedd
### Explanation This should set up everything we need for our initial launch. Test coverage is at 100% to ensure nothing breaks. ### Issue _No response_ ### Attestations - [x] I have read and agree to the [Code of Conduct](https://docs.nhcarrigan.com/community/coc/) - [x] I have read and agree to the [Community Guidelines](https://docs.nhcarrigan.com/community/guide/). - [x] My contribution complies with the [Contributor Covenant](https://docs.nhcarrigan.com/dev/covenant/). ### Dependencies - [x] I have pinned the dependencies to a specific patch version. ### Style - [x] I have run the linter and resolved any errors. - [x] My pull request uses an appropriate title, matching the conventional commit standards. - [x] My scope of feat/fix/chore/etc. correctly matches the nature of changes in my pull request. ### Tests - [x] My contribution adds new code, and I have added tests to cover it. - [ ] My contribution modifies existing code, and I have updated the tests to reflect these changes. - [x] All new and existing tests pass locally with my changes. - [x] Code coverage remains at or above the configured threshold. ### Documentation Coming soon - I'm working on the infra for docs next ### Versioning Major - My pull request introduces a breaking change. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/nhcarrigan/rig-task-bot/pulls/2 Co-authored-by: Naomi Carrigan <commits@nhcarrigan.com> Co-committed-by: Naomi Carrigan <commits@nhcarrigan.com>
382 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
382 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* @copyright nhcarrigan
|
|
* @license Naomi's Public License
|
|
* @author Naomi Carrigan
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import {
|
|
ApplicationCommandOptionType,
|
|
InteractionContextType,
|
|
} from "discord.js";
|
|
import { describe, it, expect, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
import { list } from "../../src/commands/list.js";
|
|
import { errorHandler } from "../../src/utils/errorHandler.js";
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("../../src/utils/errorHandler.ts", () => {
|
|
return {
|
|
errorHandler: vi.fn(),
|
|
};
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("list command", () => {
|
|
it("should have the correct data", () => {
|
|
expect.assertions(34);
|
|
expect(list.data.name, "did not have the correct name").toBe("list");
|
|
expect(list.data.name.length, "name is too long").toBeLessThanOrEqual(32);
|
|
expect(list.data.name, "name has invalid characters").toMatch(
|
|
/^[-_\p{L}\p{N}\p{sc=Deva}\p{sc=Thai}]{1,32}$/u,
|
|
);
|
|
expect(list.data.description, "did not have the correct description").toBe(
|
|
"List all tasks, with optional filters.",
|
|
);
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.description.length,
|
|
"description is too long",
|
|
).toBeLessThanOrEqual(100);
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.contexts,
|
|
"did not have the correct context",
|
|
).toStrictEqual([ InteractionContextType.Guild ]);
|
|
expect(list.data.options, "should have 4 options").toHaveLength(4);
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().name,
|
|
"did not have the correct option name",
|
|
).toBe("priority");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().description,
|
|
"did not have the correct option description",
|
|
).toBe("List tasks under this priority.");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().required,
|
|
"did not have the correct option required value",
|
|
).toBeFalsy();
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().type,
|
|
"did not have the correct option type",
|
|
).toBe(ApplicationCommandOptionType.String);
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().choices,
|
|
"should have 5 choices",
|
|
).toHaveLength(5);
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().choices[0].name,
|
|
"should have the correct name",
|
|
).toBe("Low");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().choices[0].value,
|
|
"should have the correct value",
|
|
).toBe("low");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().choices[1].name,
|
|
"should have the correct name",
|
|
).toBe("Medium");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().choices[1].value,
|
|
"should have the correct value",
|
|
).toBe("medium");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().choices[2].name,
|
|
"should have the correct name",
|
|
).toBe("High");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().choices[2].value,
|
|
"should have the correct value",
|
|
).toBe("high");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().choices[3].name,
|
|
"should have the correct name",
|
|
).toBe("Critical");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().choices[3].value,
|
|
"should have the correct value",
|
|
).toBe("critical");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().choices[4].name,
|
|
"should have the correct name",
|
|
).toBe("None");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[0].toJSON().choices[4].value,
|
|
"should have the correct value",
|
|
).toBe("none");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[1].toJSON().name,
|
|
"did not have the correct option name",
|
|
).toBe("tag");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[1].toJSON().description,
|
|
"did not have the correct option description",
|
|
).toBe("List tasks with this tag.");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[1].toJSON().required,
|
|
"did not have the correct option required value",
|
|
).toBeFalsy();
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[1].toJSON().type,
|
|
"did not have the correct option type",
|
|
).toBe(ApplicationCommandOptionType.String);
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[2].toJSON().name,
|
|
"did not have the correct option name",
|
|
).toBe("assignee");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[2].toJSON().description,
|
|
"did not have the correct option description",
|
|
).toBe("List tasks assigned to this user.");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[2].toJSON().required,
|
|
"did not have the correct option required value",
|
|
).toBeFalsy();
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[2].toJSON().type,
|
|
"did not have the correct option type",
|
|
).toBe(ApplicationCommandOptionType.User);
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[3].toJSON().name,
|
|
"did not have the correct option name",
|
|
).toBe("completed");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[3].toJSON().description,
|
|
"did not have the correct option description",
|
|
).toBe("List completed tasks.");
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[3].toJSON().required,
|
|
"did not have the correct option required value",
|
|
).toBeFalsy();
|
|
expect(
|
|
list.data.options[3].toJSON().type,
|
|
"did not have the correct option type",
|
|
).toBe(ApplicationCommandOptionType.Boolean);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("should execute correctly with no filters", async() => {
|
|
expect.assertions(3);
|
|
const mockBot = {
|
|
database: {
|
|
tasks: {
|
|
findMany: vi.fn().mockImplementation((data) => {
|
|
return [
|
|
{
|
|
assignees: [],
|
|
completed: false,
|
|
deleted: false,
|
|
description: "Task 1 description",
|
|
dueAt: new Date("September 4, 2000"),
|
|
numericalId: 1,
|
|
priority: "none",
|
|
tags: [],
|
|
title: "Task 1",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
assignees: [ "123", "456" ],
|
|
completed: true,
|
|
deleted: true,
|
|
description: "Task 2 description",
|
|
dueAt: new Date(),
|
|
numericalId: 2,
|
|
priority: "low",
|
|
tags: [ "tag1", "tag2" ],
|
|
title: "Task 2",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
assignees: [ "789" ],
|
|
completed: false,
|
|
deleted: false,
|
|
description: "Task 3 description",
|
|
dueAt: new Date("October 8, 2001"),
|
|
numericalId: 3,
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
tags: [ "tag1" ],
|
|
title: "Task 3",
|
|
},
|
|
].filter((task) => {
|
|
return Object.entries(data.where).every(([ key, value ]) => {
|
|
return task[key] === value;
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
} as never;
|
|
const mockInteraction = {
|
|
deferReply: vi.fn(),
|
|
editReply: vi.fn(),
|
|
options: {
|
|
getBoolean: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(null),
|
|
getString: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(null),
|
|
getUser: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(null),
|
|
},
|
|
} as never;
|
|
await list.run(mockBot, mockInteraction);
|
|
expect(
|
|
mockInteraction.deferReply,
|
|
"should defer the reply",
|
|
).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ ephemeral: true });
|
|
expect(
|
|
mockBot.database.tasks.findMany,
|
|
"should query database",
|
|
).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
where: {
|
|
completed: false,
|
|
deleted: false,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(
|
|
mockInteraction.editReply,
|
|
"should call editReply",
|
|
).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
content: "- Task 1: Task 1\n- Task 3: Task 3",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("should execute correctly with no data", async() => {
|
|
expect.assertions(3);
|
|
const mockBot = {
|
|
database: {
|
|
tasks: {
|
|
findMany: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
|
|
return [];
|
|
}),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
} as never;
|
|
const mockInteraction = {
|
|
deferReply: vi.fn(),
|
|
editReply: vi.fn(),
|
|
options: {
|
|
getBoolean: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(false),
|
|
getString: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(null),
|
|
getUser: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(null),
|
|
},
|
|
} as never;
|
|
await list.run(mockBot, mockInteraction);
|
|
expect(
|
|
mockInteraction.deferReply,
|
|
"should defer the reply",
|
|
).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ ephemeral: true });
|
|
expect(
|
|
mockBot.database.tasks.findMany,
|
|
"should query database",
|
|
).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
where: {
|
|
completed: false,
|
|
deleted: false,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(
|
|
mockInteraction.editReply,
|
|
"should call editReply",
|
|
).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
content: "No tasks found with this current filter.",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("should execute correctly with filters", async() => {
|
|
expect.assertions(3);
|
|
const mockBot = {
|
|
database: {
|
|
tasks: {
|
|
findMany: vi.fn().mockImplementation((data) => {
|
|
return [
|
|
{
|
|
assignees: [],
|
|
completed: false,
|
|
deleted: false,
|
|
description: "Task 1 description",
|
|
dueAt: new Date(),
|
|
numericalId: 1,
|
|
priority: "none",
|
|
tags: [],
|
|
title: "Task 1",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
assignees: [ "123", "456" ],
|
|
completed: true,
|
|
deleted: false,
|
|
description: "Task 2 description",
|
|
dueAt: new Date(),
|
|
numericalId: 2,
|
|
priority: "low",
|
|
tags: [ "tag1", "tag2" ],
|
|
title: "Task 2 title",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
assignees: [ "789" ],
|
|
completed: false,
|
|
deleted: true,
|
|
description: "Task 3 description",
|
|
dueAt: new Date(),
|
|
numericalId: 3,
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
tags: [ "tag1" ],
|
|
title: "Task 3",
|
|
},
|
|
].filter((task) => {
|
|
return Object.entries(data.where).every(([ key, value ]) => {
|
|
if (typeof value === "object") {
|
|
return task[key].includes(value.has);
|
|
}
|
|
return task[key] === value;
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
} as never;
|
|
const mockInteraction = {
|
|
deferReply: vi.fn(),
|
|
editReply: vi.fn(),
|
|
options: {
|
|
getBoolean: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(true),
|
|
getString: vi.fn().mockImplementation((name) => {
|
|
return name === "priority"
|
|
? "low"
|
|
: "tag1";
|
|
}),
|
|
getUser: vi.fn().mockReturnValue({ id: "123" }),
|
|
},
|
|
} as never;
|
|
await list.run(mockBot, mockInteraction);
|
|
expect(
|
|
mockInteraction.deferReply,
|
|
"should defer the reply",
|
|
).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ ephemeral: true });
|
|
expect(
|
|
mockBot.database.tasks.findMany,
|
|
"should query database",
|
|
).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
where: {
|
|
assignees: { has: "123" },
|
|
completed: true,
|
|
deleted: false,
|
|
priority: "low",
|
|
tags: { has: "tag1" },
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(
|
|
mockInteraction.editReply,
|
|
"should call editReply",
|
|
).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
content: "- Task 2: Task 2 title",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("should handle errors correctly", async() => {
|
|
expect.assertions(1);
|
|
await list.run(
|
|
{} as never,
|
|
{ editReply: vi.fn(), replied: false, reply: vi.fn() } as never,
|
|
);
|
|
expect(errorHandler, "should call error handler").toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("should handle errors with interaction.reply correctly", async() => {
|
|
expect.assertions(1);
|
|
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
|
await list.run(
|
|
{} as never,
|
|
{ editReply: vi.fn(), replied: true, reply: vi.fn() } as never,
|
|
);
|
|
expect(errorHandler, "should call error handler").toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|