### Explanation
_No response_
### Issue
_No response_
### Attestations
- [x] I have read and agree to the [Code of Conduct](https://docs.nhcarrigan.com/community/coc/)
- [x] I have read and agree to the [Community Guidelines](https://docs.nhcarrigan.com/community/guide/).
- [x] My contribution complies with the [Contributor Covenant](https://docs.nhcarrigan.com/dev/covenant/).
### Dependencies
- [x] I have pinned the dependencies to a specific patch version.
### Style
- [x] I have run the linter and resolved any errors.
- [x] My pull request uses an appropriate title, matching the conventional commit standards.
- [x] My scope of feat/fix/chore/etc. correctly matches the nature of changes in my pull request.
### Tests
- [x] My contribution adds new code, and I have added tests to cover it.
- [x] My contribution modifies existing code, and I have updated the tests to reflect these changes.
- [x] All new and existing tests pass locally with my changes.
- [x] Code coverage remains at or above the configured threshold.
### Documentation
_No response_
### Versioning
Minor - My pull request introduces a new non-breaking feature.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/nhcarrigan/eslint-config/pulls/11
Co-authored-by: Naomi Carrigan <commits@nhcarrigan.com>
Co-committed-by: Naomi Carrigan <commits@nhcarrigan.com>
This gives us a much more robust configuration for our rules. Additionally, it expects tests to be converted to the `expect` API.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/nhcarrigan/eslint-config/pulls/2
Co-authored-by: Naomi Carrigan <commits@nhcarrigan.com>
Co-committed-by: Naomi Carrigan <commits@nhcarrigan.com>
This is a pretty sizeable change. It also removes all external configuration sets. Every rule is now defined by us.
Additionally, this version will conflict with other formatters, and should not be used in tandem with Prettier.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/nhcarrigan/eslint-config/pulls/1
Co-authored-by: Naomi Carrigan <commits@nhcarrigan.com>
Co-committed-by: Naomi Carrigan <commits@nhcarrigan.com>
